Innovating Faster: We don't stop walking when we learn to run, now, do we…
Too many leaders feel that the only way to drive new innovations
is to rip up what was there before. This does not make sense.
The existing debate over healthcare insurance is a case in
point. It is either an entirely new healthcare scheme (government funded) or
nothing. The existing employer-based scheme seems to work well but not for all.
Why not then try to solve the problem by keeping what works and deriving lessons
from what works to create a hybrid solution? Keep what works and supplement it with another
solution that could be government funded. First learn from what works and use
it on the supplemental solution.
It is in the “walking” or “what works”, where valuable
lessons reside; wisdom that innovators can learn from and lessons that can be
adapted and tweaked into the next new thing.
We don’t throw away walking once we learn to run, now, do
we…
Levi jeans did not stop making jeans when faced with
designer jeans (Jordache started the trend in the late 70’s?) No, they used
what they already knew and optimized it to deliver entirely new lines of jeans.
It took them a bit, but they did it. I am not privy to the thinking of the
product managers at the time, but for certain they must have asked: “What are
our jean wearers’ hidden desires that we are not addressing with our existing
products.” (A classic design-thinking question, by the way.)
Did Lego stop making sets? No, they adapted and optimized
what they did best and innovated new “themed” Lego sets. I am certain that the
product managers must have asked: “what are the evolving toy and entertainment
trends that we can leverage in our transformation.” Here I imagine they must
have run multiple reframing scenarios of what constitutes a Lego set. And here we are, Lego sets that turn into
cars, boats, etc. And movies! Movies, of course, being the quintessential
entertainment asset that keeps on giving; much longer, that is, than a toy that
is bought only once.
How about 3M? One of the most innovate companies of all
time. They leveraged their capabilities in developing glues to invent Post-It
notes. I am sure it took someone to ask the question: “Is there a possible
market for weak glue?”
There are so many definitions of what an “innovation” is out
there. I will throw yet another into the winds of ambiguity. An
innovation can be an incremental upgrading of existing capabilities to meet an
unrealized desire inherent in an existing product. Want another simple
example? Different color Post-It notes. Another, different color electrical
tape (huge hit that led to them being used in all sorts of ways unrelated to
electricity), how about duct tape and their use of color and designs (another
huge hit.)
Who knew, people like tape of different colors and psychedelic
designs.
The key, of course, is figuring out the unmet desire. And
clearly people wanted these things. How difficult was it to optimize their
machinery and processes to add color? I suspect not too much. An optimization here
and there and you have an entire new market of colors for completely new uses,
some artistic.
The good thing is that many organizations are on this
journey. It is encouraging to see companies now actively promoting into their
executive ranks design thinkers, Chief Innovation/learning/experience/new
Insights/officers. The likes of State Farm, ICF, REI, Pepsi are executing well
in their transformations by turning themselves into design thinking companies
and leveraging decades of expertise into the next set of product. I commend these
companies for complementing that ethos with new mindsets in order to develop
the necessary fore-vision capabilities to find those new simple concepts (can’t
get any simpler than adding colors) that can gratify unfulfilled desires.
In conclusion: existing
capabilities that have worked well are absolutely relevant to the next new
thing: optimize the walking and get faster in the running.
Comments